The Achievement of Some Companions in Confronting Isra'iliyyat: A Critique and Review

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

Abstract

Despite the Prophet Muḥammad’s (PBUH) prohibition against referring to the People of the Book (Ahl al-Kitāb), some Muslims did not refrain from narrating traditions or using their sources. This approach expanded significantly after the Prophet’s (PBUH) demise. Examining the conduct of his successors in dealing with Isra’iliyyat and their transmitters in Sunni and Shiʿi sources reveals contradictions that necessitate a thorough and comprehensive study. This research employs a library-based method and descriptive-analytical processing. Findings indicate that after the Prophet’s (PBUH) passing, some Companions not only failed to prevent recourse to the People of the Book or interactions with narrators of Isra’iliyyat but also promoted these fabrications among Muslims, advocating the idea of "Ḥasbunā Kitāb Allāh." Their aim was to reinforce the notion that the Quran alone suffices, rendering the Prophet’s (PBUH) Sunnah unnecessary, by comparing Israelite superstitions with Prophetic traditions. This move, ostensibly to preserve the political status of the Prophet’s (PBUH) successors, had severe negative consequences, including the proliferation of fabricated hadith and the infiltration of Isra’iliyyat into Quranic exegesis (Tafsir). The results demonstrate how political motivations influenced intellectual and doctrinal developments in Islamic society. This study also underscores the importance of critically re-examining hadith and historical sources in light of their political contexts. Its findings may pave the way for deeper investigations into the role of politico-intellectual currents in shaping Islamic foundations and help researchers adopt a more analytical approach to religious texts.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
The Holy Quran
Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd, A. (1984). Sharḥ Nahj al-Balāghah. Qom: Ayatollah Mar'ashi Najafi Library. 
Ibn Athīr, A. (1989). Usd al-Ghābah fī Ma'rifat al-Ṣaḥābah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Mubārak, A. (n.d.). al-Zuhd wa al-Raqāʼiq. (al-A'zami, H. Ed). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʻAsqalānī, A. (1995). al-Iṣābah fī Tamyʼz al-Ṣaḥābah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʻAsqalānī, A. (n.d.). Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb. Beirut: Dar Sadir. 
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʻAsqalānī, A. (n.d.). Fatḥ al-Bārī. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah. 
Ibn Ḥanbal, A. (1996). al-Musnad. (Barhoum, A. Ed). Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risalah. 
Ibn Khaldūn, A. (1958). Muqaddimat Ibn Khaldūn. Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Organization. 
Ibn Khaldūn, A. (1988). Dīwān al-Mubtada wa al-Khabar. (Shehadeh, Kh. Ed). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. 
Ibn Saʻd, M. (n.d.). al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubrā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Shahr Ᾱshūb, M. (2000). Manāqib Al Abi Talib (AS). Qom: Allameh Publications. 
Ibn ʻAbd al-Barr, Y. (1992). al-Istīʻāb fī Maʻrifat al-Aṣḥāb. Beirut: Dar al-Jil. 
Ibn Kathīr, A. (1999). Tafsir al-Quran al-ʻAẓīm. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 
Ibn Manẓūr, M. (1994). Lisān al-ʻArab. Beirut: Dar Sadir. 
Abū Rayyah, M. (1994). Aḍwāʼ ʻalā al-Sunnah al-Muhammadīyyah. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif.
Abū Shuʻbah, M. (1988). al-Isra'iliyyat wa al-Mawḍūʻat fī Kutub al-Tafsīr. Cairo: Maktabat al-Sunnah.
Iṣfahānī, A. (1975). Ḥilyat al-Awlīyāʼ wa Ṭabaqāt al-Aṣfīyāʼ. Egypt: Al-Sa'adah.   
Amin, A. (1975). Fajr al-Islam. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahdah al-Misriyyah. 
Bukhārī, M. (2010). al-Jāmiʻ al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Torbat-e Jam: Ahmad Jami Publications.
Behrouz, A. (1980). History of Arabic Literature. Tabriz: University of Tabriz Publications. 
Damirī, M. (2004). Ḥayāṭ al-Ḥayawān al-Kubrā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 
Diyari, M. (2004). A Study on Isra'iliyyat in the Exegesis of the Quran. Tehran: Sohrewardi Research and Publishing Office. 
Dhahabī, Sh. (1999). Tadhkirat al-Ḥuffāẓ. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 
Dhahabī, M. (1994). Sīyar Aʻlam al-Nubalāʼ. )Arna'ut, Y. Ed). Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risalah. 
Dhahabī, M. (2004). al-Isra'iliyyat fī al-Tafsīr wa al-Hadith. Cairo: Maktabat Wahbah. 
Dhahabī, M. (n.d.). al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-Arabi. 
Rafīʻī, M. (2012). Arab Literature History. Cairo: Hindawi Foundation for Education and Culture. 
Rahimiyan, A. (2018). "Critique and Analysis of Iranian Intellectual Arguments Regarding the Quran's Dependence." Safinah Quarterly. Vol. 15, no. 58, pp. 10-57. 
Ramadan Bouti, M. (2020). Critique on Quran Dependence. (Alizadeh, K. Trans). Tehran: Ehsan Publications.
Subhani, J. (1994). Buḥūthun fī al-Milal wa al-Niḥal. Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation 
Sanʻānī, A. (1983). al-Muṣannaf. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 
Ṭabarī, M. (1874). Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī. Lucknow: Munshi Nawal Kishore Press. 
Ṭabarī, M. (1967). Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk. (Ibrahim, M. Ed). Beirut: Dar al-Turath. 
Ṭurayḥī, F. (1996). Majmaʻ al-Baḥrayn. Tehran: Murtazavi Bookstore. 
Etratdoost, M. (2023). " Critique of the Intellectual Trend of Quran Dependency in the Interpretive Thought of Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani." Quran and Hadith Studies Quarterly. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 191-216. 
Askari, M. (2008). The Role of Imams in Reviving Religion. Qom: Munir Publications. 
Askari, M. (2007). Maʻālim al-Madrasatayn. Qom: Usul al-Din University. 
Kulaynī, M. (1984). al-Kāfī. (Ghaffari, A. Ed). Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. 
Murtaḍā al-Alami, J. (1999). al-Ṣaḥīḥ min Sīrah al-Nabī al-Aʻẓam. Beirut: Dar al-Sirah. 
Mas'udi, A. (1989). Murūj al-Dhahab. Qom: Dar al-Hijrah.
 
Volume 2, Issue 3
September 2025
Pages 153-178
  • Receive Date: 08 May 2025
  • Revise Date: 09 July 2025
  • Accept Date: 16 July 2025
  • First Publish Date: 23 August 2025
  • Publish Date: 23 August 2025