The Prophetic Sunnah, after the Holy Qur’an, is the second authoritative source for deriving Islamic teachings; however, its scope and degree of authority have long been subjects of debate among Islamic scholars. In this regard, three main viewpoints can be identified: "The absolute authority of the Sunnah, the authority of the Sunnah in religious matters but not in non-religious affairs, and the differentiation of authority based on the Prophet’s threefold roles, prophetic mission, judiciary, and governance." Using a descriptive-analytical method and a critical approach, this study seeks to present a rational explanation of the Prophet’s consultations based on the theory of differentiating these roles. The findings indicate that consultation holds different positions in each of these three domains; in the context of the Prophet’s mission, consultation has no place because the mission is sacred in nature; in the judicial role, consultation is clearly relevant, since judicial rulings are issued on the basis of hearing evidence and outward judgments, making consultation functional; but in the domain of governance and leadership, consultation differs from the previous two. Here, consultation represents the application of collective reasoning in non-revelatory matters and in the system of governance. Therefore, it is not merely educational or ceremonial but an effective and decisive element in decision-making. This analysis shows that the Prophet’s consultations are not only compatible with his infallibility and exalted status, but also reflect the rational dimension of the Prophetic practice.